Print ISSN: 2394-6369
Online ISSN: 2394-6377
CODEN : IJCBK6
International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research (IJCBR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...Original Article
Author Details :
Volume : 3, Issue : 4, Year : 2016
Article Page : 380-386
Abstract
Background & Objective: The errors associated with the total testing process in laboratory, affecting clinical decision making, may occur at the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical phase. This study is aimed at finding out the types and frequencies of errors recorded and recommending the corrective measures in pre analytical phase, which accounts for preventable errors significantly.
Materials & Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of errors observed and recorded over 3 months period in clinical biochemistry laboratory at SMIMER hospital, Surat. Data analysis was done on an average of 12680 samples collected and tested. Samples included blood, urine and other fluids. Pre-analytical errors were identified and recorded subsequent to visual inspection of the samples and corresponding request forms by laboratory staff.
Results: Pre-analytical errors were classified as A) inappropriate form (28.24%), B) inappropriate sample (3.52%), C) inappropriate transport (22.16%) and D) inappropriate centrifugation (7.29%). For category A, high error rate for date and time of sample collection (99.97%), provisional diagnosis (99.92%) and physician’s detail (100%) were observed. For category B, error rate for insufficient sample volume was 26.38%. For category C, error rate for date and time of sample receipt was 100%. Pre-analytical error rate was highest for samples received from outpatient department (18.37%) and for urine sample (18.61%) comparatively.
Conclusion: Pre-examination errors were high at this study location. Measures aimed at reducing the same and exposure to accreditation are recommended for improved laboratory quality output.
Keywords: Errors in Laboratory Medicine; Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory; Pre-analytical phase; Corrective measures
How to cite : Lad H D, Rana N M, Chaudhari V S, Ramavataram D, A study of preanalytical errors in a hospital based clinical biochemistry laboratory and recommendation of required corrective measures. Int J Clin Biochem Res 2016;3(4):380-386
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.