International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research

Print ISSN: 2394-6369

Online ISSN: 2394-6377

CODEN : IJCBK6

International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research (IJCBR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

Article type

Null


Article page

5-12


Authors Details

Sunaiba M, Avinash S.S, Arunkumar K, Malathi M, Shivashankara A. R, Ashwini K


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 1458

PDF Downloaded: 634


ANALYTICAL METHOD COMPARISON OF ADVANCED OXIDATION PROTEIN PRODUCTS (AOPP) WITH MODIFIED AOPP


Null

Author Details : Sunaiba M, Avinash S.S, Arunkumar K, Malathi M, Shivashankara A. R, Ashwini K

Volume : 2, Issue : 1, Year : 2015

Article Page : 5-12


Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Introduction: AOPP (Advanced oxidation protein products) are the dityrosine containing protein cross linking products indicating the oxidised tyrosine residues of the plasma protein albumin, fibrinogen and lipoproteins. AOPP are elevated in oxidative stress and inflammation. Unlike AOPP the mAOPP estimation is not interfered by triglyeride levels.

Objective: Analytical method comparison of AOPP with mAOPP.
Materials and Methods: Measurement of AOPP involves the principle of spectrophotometric determination of oxidation of I- plasma AOPP under acidic condition by Witko Sarsat method. To remove the interference by the triglycerides especially seen in hypertriglyceridemia, the plasma was treated with lipid precipitating agent and the mAOPP were measured. In this study using pooled serum samples we compared the performance characteristics like precision, accuracy, linearity limit and reference range of AOPP assay with the mAOPP assay under our laboratory conditions as per CLIA guidelines of method validation.
Results and Discussion: The intrarun, intraday, interday and overall precision of AOPP (4.25%, 5.18%, 3.89%, 5%) was better than that of mAOPP (5.76%, 5.5%, 5.8%, and 5.8%). But on linear regression, mAOPP = 0.5×AOPP + 9.8 chloramine T equivalents (r2-0.62; p < 0.001) and the AOPP was 18% higher than mAOPP. In eutriglyceridemia however, mAOPP = 0.7xAOPP + 4.8 chloramine T equivalents (r2 = 0.75; p < 0.001) and the AOPP was only 14.5% higher. Also the correlation (r = 0.74) of AOPP – mAOPP levels with TG showed that the difference was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the persons with higher TG levels clearly establishing the overestimation of AOPP.
Conclusion: Hence mAOPP may prove to be a better estimate of protein oxidation status and a better diagnostic and prognostic indicator compared to AOPP especially in hypertriglyceridemic patients.


How to cite : Sunaiba M, S.s A, Arunkumar K, Malathi M, Shivashankara A. R, Ashwini K, ANALYTICAL METHOD COMPARISON OF ADVANCED OXIDATION PROTEIN PRODUCTS (AOPP) WITH MODIFIED AOPP. Int J Clin Biochem Res 2015;2(1):5-12

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.