International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research

Print ISSN: 2394-6369

Online ISSN: 2394-6377

CODEN : IJCBK6

International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research (IJCBR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

234- 238


Authors Details

Arul Vijaya Vani, Suganya , Soundravally*, Haritha Sagili, Niranjjan


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 1323

PDF Downloaded: 808


Comparison of American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria in the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in South Indian population


Original Article

Author Details : Arul Vijaya Vani, Suganya , Soundravally*, Haritha Sagili, Niranjjan

Volume : 6, Issue : 2, Year : 2019

Article Page : 234-238

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcbr.2019.052



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) depends on the guidelines used.This study was carried out to compare ADA criteria`s diagnostic accuracy and validity in diagnosing GDM and its complication considering WHO criteria as gold standard. 
Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent 75 gram Oral Glucose Tolerance test (OGTT) for GDM screening were included in the study. The retrospective data included 559 subjects, whereas prospective design included 620 mothers who were followed for maternal and foetal outcomes. 
Results: Prevalence of GDM was 11.2%. ADA and WHO criteria were found to have an agreement of 0.69. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value of ADA was 69.81%, 97.58%, 74.0% and 97.03% respectively. WHO second hour identified all cases of GDM. Mothers diagnosed to have GDM by either criterion were older, had increased body mass index. The difference in the prevalence of preeclampsia (p=0.02), macrosomia (p=0.001) and increased birth weight (p=0.003) were found to be significant in WHO criteria alone. Maternal and foetal outcomes didn’t show any significant difference.
Conclusion: This study concludes that the diagnostic accuracy of ADA was comparable with WHO criteria. WHO criteria predicated the complications of GDM at a higher rate than ADA criteria. WHO second-hour criterion alone may be used as a screening test to diagnose GDM.

Keywords: American diabetes association, Foetal outcomes, Gestational diabetes mellitus, Maternal outcomes, World health organization.


How to cite : Vani A V, Suganya, Soundravally, Sagili H, Niranjjan, Comparison of American Diabetes Association (ADA) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria in the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in South Indian population. Int J Clin Biochem Res 2019;6(2):234-238

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.