International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research

Print ISSN: 2394-6369

Online ISSN: 2394-6377

CODEN : IJCBK6

International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research (IJCBR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 440

PDF Downloaded: 367


Get Permission Jat, Sushma BJ, Roy, and Thakuriya: Study on comparison of electrolytes in hospitalized patients of critical care medicine by automated biochemistry analyzer and arterial blood gas analyzer


Introduction

Electrolytes are charged substances that are necessary for many bodily processes. They are crucial for the production of cell membrane potentials, the regulation of neurohormonal pathways, the production of energy, and the maintenance of the body's acid-base balance, among other physiological, biochemical, and metabolic processes. 1

The electrolytes directly coordinate nearly every physiological activity. Variations in electrolyte levels, ranging from minor to significant, can be caused by a multitude of illnesses or several consequences. They may be acute or chronic, and they may cause issues that are potentially fatal. 2, 3 Reversing metabolic abnormalities always requires sufficient treatment, regardless of the underlying cause. 3 Precise measurement of sodium and potassium electrolyte levels is crucial in clinical practice, particularly for patients in intensive care units. 4

There are often two methods used on a daily basis. On the one hand, central laboratory autoanalyzers (AAs) regularly assess electrolytes from serum, but the time it takes to obtain findings after drawing blood is dependent on a number of variables, including transit time after sample collection, sample processing, and laboratory sample analysis. 5 This kind of delay could jeopardize critically ill patients' care. However, on the other hand the arterial blood gas (ABG) analyzers are widely used in almost all emergency rooms and intensive care units (ICUs) because they allow fast data collection and therapeutic response, 6, 7 as intensive care unit (ICU) patients may have nonspecific signs and symptoms of electrolyte abnormalities. 8, 9

Treatments meant to preserve essential organ functions have an impact on electrolyte balance. As a result, people who are critically ill are more likely than those who are not to experience electrolyte imbalances. In ICU patients, the frequency of electrolyte imbalances is close to 25%.2 Serum potassium and sodium levels have been demonstrated in recent studies 10, 11 to be important predictors of death in ICU patients. For this reason, it is crucial that electrolyte imbalances in ICU patients be corrected completely and promptly. In these conditions, it is clear how important it is to have the serum electrolyte level findings as soon as possible. The autoanalyzers (AA) at hospital central laboratories are used to assess serum electrolytes using the indirect ion sensing (ISE) approach. 12, 13

Blood gas analysis (BGA) is a useful test for determining blood pH, bicarbonate content, oxygen saturation, oxygen content, and partial pressures of carbon dioxide and oxygen.14 This enables medical professionals to assess the patient's hypoxia and acid-base imbalances; as a result, BGA is crucial to the treatment of acute respiratory failure, carrying out surgery, and tending to the severely ill. Furthermore, some manufacturers offer further tests, such as lactate and electrolyte assessments, which can provide doctors with more precise information about a patient's status and aid in patient management. 15 Whole blood is utilized in arterial blood gas analyzer technology to measure the electrolytes using ISE technology. Serum samples are utilized in auto analyzers to assess the electrolyte value using ISE technology. 1 Therefore, the estimated values of sodium and potassium in the serum sample and whole blood sample ought to be the same. As a result, we believe it to be interchangeable. Comparing these two approaches results in the publication of massive research. The findings of these studies' statistical analyses demonstrated the highly substantial distinction between these two approaches. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Water homeostasis primarily controls serum sodium concentration, and any disruption to this balance is the primary cause of salt disorder. Drinking water and having arginine vasopressin in circulation are the two main defense mechanisms for serum osmolality. Most cases of sodium problems are caused by deficiencies in one or both of these two defense mechanisms. 2 On the other hand, imbalances in the body's sodium content, which is a crucial factor in determining the volume of extracellular fluid and the integrity of the circulatory system, result from anomalies in salt homeostasis. The posterior pituitary's secretion of arginine vasopressin is also influenced by volume status. 16 At every serum osmolality level, hypovolemia is linked to greater circulating levels of the hormone. Heart failure and cirrhosis are among the conditions caused by hypervolemia that result in arterial underfilling. The neurohormonal activation that goes along with this condition includes an increase in circulating arginine vasopressin, which causes water retention and hypernatremia.

Despite significant variations in dietary potassium intake, the homeostatic system maintains plasma potassium concentrations between 3.5 mmol/L and 5.3 mmol/L. Of the entire daily food intake, 90% of the potassium is eliminated by urine and 10% through feces. An essential mechanism for maintaining potassium homeostasis is the kidney. Up to 98% of total body potassium is mostly found in the intracellular compartment. 17 The huge intracellular pool, which is crucial for maintaining the homeostasis of plasma potassium concentration, primarily determines the extracellular potassium value. Significant hypokalaemia and hyperkalaemia are brought on by variations in the influx and efflux of intracellular and extracellular potassium. Severe hyperkalaemia can result from massive necrosis that releases intracellular potassium; acute renal damage and decreased potassium excretion exacerbate this disease.

Along with sodium and potassium, chloride is one of the main electrolytes in extracellular fluid and is essential for preserving appropriate fluid balance. Preventing problems including electrolyte imbalances, edema, and dehydration in critical care settings requires careful attention to electrolyte balance. Renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate, and tubular function are among the processes that are impacted by chloride ions. 18 Metabolic acidosis is frequently observed in patients receiving critical care due to a variety of conditions, including organ malfunction, infection, and tissue hypoperfusion. Since chloride ions are involved in acid-base balance, they also have an indirect impact on respiratory function. For instance, acidosis can impair respiratory drive and function, which may put critically ill patients' breathing at risk. 6

It is widely accepted that electrolyte homeostasis is crucial to the normal operation of various metabolic processes and organ functions in the human body. As a result, electrolyte imbalances can occur in a variety of medical illnesses, including chronic renal failure 18 and diabetes mellitus. 19 as well as in some cancer patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy. 20

The introduction of such blood gas analysers has substantially improved the management of these patients, particularly those who are severely ill. The main advantage of these blood gas analyzers is that they do not require centrifugation. Furthermore, blood gas analysers often require only 2 or 3 minutes to complete the entire testing process. 21

In contrast, autoanalyzers used for biochemical studies require that samples be centrifuged prior to testing. This process would take at least ten minutes. In addition to the pre-analytical process, electrolyte measurements in autoanalyzers take time since they use advanced methodologies. In clinical laboratories, the turnaround time for tests in autoanalyzers is frequently set at 90 minutes, which accounts for centrifugation, test methods, and sample amount. Although most doctors and laboratory technologists believe that autoanalyzer results are more exact and reliable, their relatively high turnaround time restricts their usefulness in the management of critically ill patients. 22

Aim and Objectives

Aim

To compare the levels of electrolytes estimated using ABG analyser and automated analyzer of admitted patients in critical care medicine unit.

Objectives

  1. To estimate and compare the levels of electrolytes (sodium, potassium and chloride) estimated using ABG analyser and automated analyzer of admitted patients in critical care medicine unit.

  2. To determine the correlation of serum electrolytes between ABG analyzer and automated analyzer, and find out to what extent these values are similar.

Materials and Methods

Study area

This research was carried out in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory at National Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan in association with Department of Critical Care Medicine Unit after obtaining informed consent and institutional ethical committee clearance, NIMS University, Jaipur.

Study design

Prospective hospital based observational study.

Sample size

A total of 195 patients was be selected for the study.

Formula

n = Zα/₂² *Ŝe * (1- Ŝe)

d² *(1-P)

n= 1.96² *0.974 * (1-0.974)

(0.05) ² * (1-0.8)

n= 194.57 ≅ 195 samples.

Total samples were 195.

Zα/₂ = inverse probability of normal distribution at 95% Confidence of interval.

Se: sensitivity of RAPIDROLNT 500 of potassium.

d: margin of error (5% considered)

P: expected prevalence rate.

Inclusion criteria

Patients admitted in Department of Critical Care Medicine whose ABG analysis and venous blood sample analysis for electrolytes testing done at same time and patients willing to provide voluntary informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Improper timing of samples.

2. Insufficient sample volume.

Data collection

In all the patients included in the study weight (Kgs) and height (metre) was measured and body mass index (BMI) was calculated 23 by dividing weight (Kgs) with height (meter2). Blood pressure was measured using sphygmomanometer as per the standard protocols.23

Sample Collection and Electrolyte Analysis

2 ml arterial blood was collected for ABG analysis based on principle ion-selective electrode for electrolytes estimation in hospitalized patients and at the same time 2 ml venous blood sample was collected for electrolyte determination by automated biochemistry analyser vitros 5600 based on the principle ion-selective electrode.

Results

The present study included a total of 195 hospitalized patients of Critical Care Medicine Unit according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Figure 1

Age-wise distribution of patients

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/d13e143e-ae7d-4c14-bc72-8f7c6ecf8dc9image1.png

In Figure 1, age-wise distribution of patients enrolled in the study is shown. Out of 195 patients 1(0.51%), 23(11.79%), 54(27.69%), 89(45.64%), 24(12.31%) and 4(2.05%) were in the age group of 30-40 years, 41-50 years, 51-60 years, 61-70 years and, more than 70 years respectively. Patients were majorly in the age group 51-60 years.

Figure 2

Gender distribution of patients

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/d13e143e-ae7d-4c14-bc72-8f7c6ecf8dc9image2.png

Figure 2 shows gender-wise distribution of the patients. Out of 195 patients 149 (76.41%) were males and 46(23.59(%) were females respectively.

Table 1

Comparison of serum electrolytes between fully automated biochemistry analyzer and arterial blood gas analyzer by using paired t-test

Variables

Automated Biochemistry Analyzer

Arterial blood Gas Analyzer

Paired t-test

P - Value

Significance

Sodium (Na+)mmol/L

136.65 ± 5.81

136.64 ± 5.44

0.105

0.4582

Not Significant

Potassium (K+) mmol/L

3.88 ± 0.543

3.87 ± 0.523

0.892

0.1867

Chloride (Cl ̶) mmol/L

100.47 ± 6.41

100.79 ± 6.65

-1.717

0.0438

Significant

Table 1 presents the comparison of sodium, potassium and chloride parameters between Automated Biochemistry Analyzer and Arterial blood Gas Analyzer groups. Any significant difference was not found in the levels of sodium (p = 0.4582) and potassium (p = 0.1867) using paired t test between the two instruments. There was significant increase in chloride levels estimated using ABG analyser as compared to automated biochemistry analyser (p=0.0438).

Table 2

Association of serum electrolytes between fully automated biochemistry analyzer and arterial blood gas analyzer by using pearson’s correlation coefficient

Electrolytes

Corr ( r )

t-test

P - Value

Significance

Sodium (Na+) mmol/L

0.973

58.34

0.00001

All are significant

Potassium (K+) mmol/L

0.979

65.86

0.00001

Chloride (Cl ̶) mmol/L

0.925

33.73

0.00001

Table 2 presents the association of electrolytes parameters between Automated Biochemistry Analyzer and Arterial blood Gas Analyzer by using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A statistically strong and highly significant agreement existed among the two instruments for the measurement of electrolytes in critically ill patients (p=0.00001).

Figure 3: Correlation of serum sodium levels in patients with fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzer vs Arterial blood Gas Analyzer

Figure 3

Scatter plot of sodium (Na+) (ABA vs. ABGA)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/d13e143e-ae7d-4c14-bc72-8f7c6ecf8dc9image3.png

Figure 3 shows the correlation of serum sodium levels between the two instruments. It is seen that the strong positive correlation existed between the two instruments (r=0.9463) having a statistically highly significant value (p<0.001).

Figure 4: Correlation of serum potassium levels in patients with fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzer vs Arterial blood Gas Analyzer

Figure 4

Scatter plot of potassium (K+) (ABA vs. ABGA)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/d13e143e-ae7d-4c14-bc72-8f7c6ecf8dc9image4.png

Figure 4 shows the correlation of serum potassium levels between the two instruments. It is seen that the strong positive correlation existed between the two instruments (r=0.954) and having a statistically highly significant value (p<0.001).

Figure 5: Correlation of serum chloride levels in patients with fully Automated Biochemistry Analyzer vs Arterial blood Gas Analyzer

Figure 5

Scatter plot of chloride (Cl-) (ABA vs. ABGA)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/d13e143e-ae7d-4c14-bc72-8f7c6ecf8dc9image5.png

Figure 5 shows the correlation of serum chloride levels between the two instruments. It is seen that the strong positive correlation existed between the two instruments (r=0.855) and statistically significant (p<0.001).

Discussion

This study was carried out in the Department of Biochemistry, along with the Department of Critical Care Medicine at National Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Jaipur (Rajasthan). This research included an aggregate of 195 patients who were at National institute of medical sciences & research, Jaipur Rajasthan India

In this research, analysis of electrolytes in hospitalized patients revealed noteworthy patterns, shedding light on the association between electrolytes compared between blood gas analyser and Fully automated biochemical analyser.

The findings of our study showed that the mean ABG sodium, potassium and chloride were 136.64 ± 5.44 mmol/L, 3.87 ± 0.523 mmol/L and 100.79 ± 6.65 mmol/L respectively. The mean ABA sodium, potassium and chloride were 136.65 ± 5.81mmol/L, 88 ± 0.543 mmol/L and 100.47 ± 6.41 mmol/L respectively. Student’s t test comparison p values for sodium, potassium and chloride were 0.458 (Not Significant), 0.1867 (Not Significant) and 0.0438 (Significant) between the two instruments.

The strength of agreement between the two instruments for sodium, potassium and chloride were analyzed using pearsons correlation coefficient. There was strong agreement for all the three parameters between the two instruments, r values of sodium, potassium and chloride were 0.973, 0.979 and 0.925 respectively, and the p value was 0.00001 for all the three parameters.

The study conducted by Chacko et al, 24 found that the mean levels of sodium was 135.8 ± 5.7 mmol/L by ABG analyser as compared to 139.9 ± 5.4 mmol/L by automated biochemistry analyser and the differences were statistically highly significant (P < 0.001).

An another study done by Morimatsu H et al stated that the sodium levels estimated by the ABG machine are not completely reliable for making clinical decisions. Although there is a statistically significant difference in the measured sodium values in patients which are hypernatremic and normo-natremic, but it was within the guidelines recommended by US CLIA. This statistically significant difference in values also express clinical differences should be further studied. 17

A cross-sectional study conducted by MN Zamanabadi 23 found that, in patients who have lung disease, mean sodium level estimated from gas and laboratory analyzer were 138.25 mEq/L and 137.57 mEq/L, respectively. This difference in values was not statistically significant, p = 0.052. In patients with heart disease, the estimated levels were 138.54 mEq/L and 137.23 mEq/L, respectively. This difference was statistically significant, p = 0.015.

Jain et al.25 carried out an observational cohort study to compare the value of electrolytes estimated by a point-of-care blood gas analyzer and an automatic biochemistry analyzer in 200 patients admitted in intensive care unit. This study showed that levels of sodium estimated by point-of-care BGA were significantly less than automatic biochemistry analyzer, but the potassium levels which were estimated did not have any significant difference statistically. A study done by Solak19 retrospectively included 2557 samples to compare the levels of sodium estimated by BGA and auto analyzer. This study showed that levels of sodium estimated by BGA are higher than autoanalyzer which are statistically significant. The results of these studies are not in accordance with our study.

In a research study by Pouryahya, Tan26 found that the values obtained by blood gas analyzer showed an significant variation for sodium, potassium and creatinine but they concluded that these variations were minor and can be fixed by precise calibration of the instrument. These differences are significantly large in preterm infants.

Rezaei Shahmirzadi, Mostafavi Toroghi 27 in his cross-sectional research study noted that the blood gas analyzer yielded significant high sodium values in comparison with autoanalyzer. Whereas Zhang, Lin28 found that the potassium values obtained by blood gas analyzer were significantly lower as compared to autoanalyzer. But they accounted that the difference in sample size, sampling methods and making of BGA and autoanalyzer could be the reasons of these discrepancies.

The interesting finding in our study is that we did not find any such differences in the values of electrolytes measured by both ABG and ABA, probably our sampling methods, quality control runs and the calibration status of both the analyzsers were accurate and the precision was taken care well in each step of the analysis. Prior to this study, we had conducted one more study on pre-analytical errors accounting for errors in laboratory results, which showed highly negligible errors with a overall prevalence of 0.52% of the total samples 79592 of clinical biochemistry unit in a duration of 6 months. The critical clinical decision can be made based on the results obtained by ABG analyzer so that there will not be any delay in the initiation of treatment in critically ill patients.

Conclusion

Our research study showed no significant changes in the electrolytes measurements obatibed by ABG analyzer and ABA analyzer. Thus, critical decisions can be made by trusting the values obtained from arterial blood gas analysis.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

A Banerjee G Mehrotra Role of correction factor in minimizing errors while calculating electrolyte values between Blood-gas analyzer and laboratory autoanalyzer: A comparative studyIndian J Crit Care Med20182213443

2 

M Hoekstra M Vogelzang V Der Horstic M Janse Implementation and evaluation of a nurse centered computerized potassium regulation protocol in the Intensive Care Unit - A before and after analysisBMC Med Inform Decis Mak20101055

3 

MJ Murray M James American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists9Lippincott Williams & WilkinsPhiladelphia, PA2002168

4 

JL Vincent E Abraham P Kochanek Textbook of Critical Care8th20111376

5 

MS Buckley JM Leblanc MJ Cawley Electrolyte disturbances associated with commonly prescribed medications in the intensive care unitCritical Care Med201038625364

6 

G Dimeski TJ Morgan JJ Presneill B Venkatesh Disagreement between ion selective electrode direct and indirect sodium measurements: estimation of the problem in a tertiary referral hospitalJ Crit Care201227332635

7 

MG Scott VA Legrys JS Klutts Electrolytes and blood gasesTietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics20069831018

8 

M Hoekstra M Vogelzang JT Drost M Janse BG Loef VD Horst Implementation and evaluation of a nurse centered computerized potassium regulation protocol in the intensive care unit--a before and after analysisBMC Med Inform Decis Mak20101015

9 

JL Vincent AE Moore FA Kochanek P Mitchell Textbook of Critical Care8thSaundersPhiladelphia (PA20111376

10 

M S Buckley J M Leblanc M U Cawley Electrolyte disturbances associated with commonly prescribed medications in the intensive care unitCrit Care Med20103838

11 

B Whelan K Bennett D O’riordan B Silke Serum sodium as a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in acute unselected medical patientsQJM2009102175182

12 

A Chawla R H Sterns S U Nigwekar J D Cappuccio Mortality and serum sodium: do patients die from or with hyponatremia?Clin J Am Soc Nephrol20116960965

13 

S A Mousavi S Shahabi E Mostafapour M Purfakharan S M Fereshtehnejad J Amini Comparison of the serum electrolyte levels among patients died and survived in the intensive care unitTanaffos2012113642

14 

H C Yi W S Shi Y H Zhang X Zhu Comparison of electrolyte and glucose levels measured by a blood gas analyzer and an automated biochemistry analyzer among hospitalized patients2020342329123291

15 

S Mikkelsen J Wolsing-Hansen M Nybo C U Maegaard S Jepsen Implementation of the ABL-90 blood gas analyzer in a ground based mobile emergency care unitScand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med2015235454

16 

M J Murray Michael James2002Lippincott Williams & WilkinsPhiladelphia, PA168169

17 

H Morimatsu J Rocktäschel R Bellomo S Uchino D Goldsmith G Gutteridge Comparison of point-of-care versus central laboratory measurement of electrolyte concentrations on calculations of the anion gap and the strong ion differenceAnaesthesiology200398510771084

18 

D B Sanakal S C Mehta R S Patil Are sodium and potassium results on arterial blood gas analyzer equivalent to those on electrolyte analyzer201620233237

19 

Y Solak Comparison of serum sodium levels measured by blood gas analyzer and biochemistry autoanalyzer in patients with hyponatremia, eunatremia, and hypernatremiaAm J Emerg Med201634814731479

20 

D B Sanakal S C Mehta R Patil Reliability of blood gas analyzer for the measurement of electrolytes - A comparative studyLnt J clin Biochem Res201634376379

21 

A Gavala P Myrianthefs Comparison of point-of-care versus central laboratory measurement of haematocrit, haemoglobin, and electrolyte concentrationsHeart Lung2017464246250

22 

J B Zhang J Lin X D Zhao Analysis of bias in measurements of potassium, sodium and haemoglobin by an emergency department-based blood gas analyzer relative to hospital laboratory autoanalyzer resultsPLoS One2015104122383122383

23 

N Z Mahnaz N Z Tina Reza A Measuring serum sodium levels using blood gas analyzer and autoanalyzer in heart and lung disease patients: A cross-sectional studyAnnals of Medicine and Surgery200278103713103713

24 

B Chacko J V Peter S Patole J J Fleming R Selvakumar Elec­trolytes assessed by point-of-care testing - Are the values comparable with results obtained from the central laboratory?Indian J Crit Care Med20111512433

25 

A Jain I Subhan M Joshi Comparison of the point-of-care blood gas analyzer versus the laboratory auto-analyzer for the measurement of electrolytesInt J Emerg. Med20092211720

26 

P Pouryahya L Tan ZC Lin A Meyer H Kim JK Kim Comparison of sodium ion levels between an arterial blood gas analyzer and an autoanalyzer in preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective studyN Z Med J1487131101

27 

A Shahmirzadi S Toroghi MH Molseghi S Amirkhanlu Comparison of Serum Sodium and Potassium Levels; Based on Two Methods Arterial Blood Gas and Automatic Laboratory AnalyzersInt J Adv Biotechnol Res20178415

28 

JB Zhang J Lin XD Zhao Analysis of bias in measurements of potassium, sodium and hemoglobin by an emergency department-based blood gas analyzer relative to hospital laboratory autoanalyzer resultsPLoS One2015104122383



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

52-58


Authors Details

Narendra Kumar Jat, Sushma BJ, Mohit Roy, Rakesh Thakuriya


Article History

Received : 17-04-2024

Accepted : 08-06-2024


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files