- Visibility 556 Views
- Downloads 521 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijcbr.v.12.i.2.3
-
CrossMark
- Citation
From calibration to confidence: Evaluating the beckman coulter AU 700 through real-world sigma performance metrics
- Author Details:
-
Jayesh Prabhakar Warade *
Background: The Beckman Coulter AU 700 clinical chemistry analyzer is a widely used instrument in high-volume laboratory settings. Its long-term stability and measurement accuracy are critical for ensuring reliable diagnostic results. This study evaluates the analyzer’s performance using sigma metrics over a six-month operational period.
Objectives: To assess the long-term measurement stability of the Beckman Coulter AU 700.To evaluate operational factors such as reagent evaporation, carryover, calibration recovery and mechanical parameters (e.g., syringe pressure).To determine if the system maintains a sigma performance level above 4.5.To inform strategies for optimizing internal quality control (IQC) and reducing associated operational costs.
Materials and Methods: A prospective process evaluation was conducted from May to October 2023 at Meenakshi Labs, Madurai. Daily data were collected on reagent stability, calibration accuracy, IQC performance, and equipment downtime. Sigma metrics were calculated for each parameter using the formula: Sigma = (TEa − Bias) / CV. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods, including confidence interval analysis, were applied.
Results: The AU 700 demonstrated exceptional measurement stability with an overall sigma score of 99.89%. Key findings include: reagent evaporation (0.75%, sigma = 4.95), carryover (0.00047%, sigma = 5.92), calibration recovery errors (0.1982%, sigma = 4.38), QC outliers (0.6815%, sigma = 3.97), syringe pressure outliers (0.04629%, sigma = 4.82), and zero instances of reagent contamination or system temperature failures (sigma = 6). Equipment downtime was minimal (0.05787%, sigma = 4.75).
Conclusions: The Beckman Coulter AU 700 exhibits high reliability and operational efficiency in high-throughput laboratory settings. Its consistent sigma performance above 4.5 across most parameters supports potential reductions in IQC frequency without compromising test accuracy. Some areas, such as QC outliers and calibration recovery, may benefit from process enhancements.
References
- Beckman Coulter Inc. Beckman Coulter AU 700 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer—Operator’s Manual. Beckman Coulter Inc.; 2023. Available from: [https://www.beckmancoulter.com/].
- Miller JJ, Gammie AJ. A Novel Approach for Routinely Assessing Laboratory Sigma Metrics for a Broad Range of Automated Assays. J Appl Lab Med. 2024;9(3):477–92.
- Westgard JO, Westgard SA. The importance of Six Sigma Quality in laboratory testing. Clin Biochem. 2014;47(12):663-4.
- CLSI EP25-A, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline, September 2009.
- Ebrahim A, DeVore K, Fischer T. Limitations of Accelerated Stability Model Based on the Arrhenius Equation for Shelf Life Estimation of In Vitro Diagnostic Products. Clin Chem. 2021;67(4):684–8
- Ahmed El-Neanaey W, Mahmoud AbdEllatif N, Abdel Haleem Abo Elwafa R. Evaluation of Sigma metric approach for monitoring the performance of automated analyzers in hematology unit of Alexandria Main University Hospital. Int J Lab Hematol. 2021;43(6):1388–93.
- Suneetha R, Krishnappa J, Dinesh K, Zeanath CJ. Seamless Care, Seamless Operations: Mitigating Medical Equipment Downtime and Maintenance Costs for Uninterrupted Patient Care. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2024;12(2):6–14.
- Tan R, Yilmaz M, Kurtulmuş Y. A practical approach example to measurement uncertainty: Evaluation of 26 immunoassay parameters. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022;32(3):030705.
- Abdel GMT, El-Masry MI. Verification of quantitative analytical methods in medical laboratories. J Med Biochem. 2021;40(3):225–
- Armbruster D. Accuracy controls: assessing trueness (bias). Clin Lab Med. 2013;33(1):125–37.
- Moosavi SM, Ghassabian S. Linearity of Calibration Curves for Analytical Methods: A Review of Criteria for Assessment of Method Reliability [Internet]. Calibration and Validation of Analytical Methods - A Sampling of Current Approaches. InTech; 2018.
- Kyle PB. Beware of carryover in modern chemistry analyzers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(4):519–21.
- David A. Armbruster, Debra B. Alexander, Sample to sample carryover: A source of analytical laboratory error and its relevance to integrated clinical chemistry/immunoassay systems. Clinica Chimica Acta. 2006;373(1-2):37–43.
- Saleh N, Gamal O, Eldosoky MAA, Shaaban AR. An integrative approach to medical laboratory equipment risk management. Sci Rep. 2024;14:4045.
- Zhang Y, Wu AH, Bender CJ. Evaluation of the performance of clinical chemistry analyzers: a comparison of analytical quality based on Six Sigma metrics. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;448:77–82.
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Warade JP. From calibration to confidence: Evaluating the beckman coulter AU 700 through real-world sigma performance metrics [Internet]. Int J Clin Biochem Res. 2025 [cited 2025 Oct 05];12(2):78-83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcbr.v.12.i.2.3
APA
Warade, J. P. (2025). From calibration to confidence: Evaluating the beckman coulter AU 700 through real-world sigma performance metrics. Int J Clin Biochem Res, 12(2), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcbr.v.12.i.2.3
MLA
Warade, Jayesh Prabhakar. "From calibration to confidence: Evaluating the beckman coulter AU 700 through real-world sigma performance metrics." Int J Clin Biochem Res, vol. 12, no. 2, 2025, pp. 78-83. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcbr.v.12.i.2.3
Chicago
Warade, J. P.. "From calibration to confidence: Evaluating the beckman coulter AU 700 through real-world sigma performance metrics." Int J Clin Biochem Res 12, no. 2 (2025): 78-83. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcbr.v.12.i.2.3