- Visibility 639 Views
- Downloads 33 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijcbr.2019.078
-
CrossMark
- Citation
A prospective comparative study of glucose estimation by hexokinase and glucose oxidase-peroxidase methods
- Author Details:
-
K Maria Kumar *
-
K Vijayakumari
-
K Sri Lakshmi
Aims and Objectives: Error analysis of the comparative study of glucose estimation with the comparison
and regression analysis.
Introduction: Glucose is the major carbohydrate found in the blood and a chief source of energy in human
body. Estimation of glucose is very important in clinical diagnosis of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and
normoglycemia. Accuracy of test results are very important, requires considerable effort and cost. For
introducing in the laboratory the test method has to be evaluated by the process called quality control.
Method selection and evaluation is important in improving efficiency.
Materials and Methods: The preferred sample for Glucose assay is fasting serum or plasma. A total of
105 samples are analysed for the quantitative estimation of blood glucose by the reference method.
Discussion and Results: In the present study comparison between a test method (Glucose oxidaseperoxidase)
and a reference method (Hexokinase), the errors are less than TEa. Mean value of Hexokinase
method is 311.36 137.315 and mean value Glucose oxidase-peroxidase method is 291.87 133.412.
p-value on comparison = 0.00014. With this the test method can be an alternative to reference method in
terms of accuracy and precision and analytical sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusion: Glucose oxidase-peroxidase method is also a suitable method for the quantitative estimation
of glucose in need of clinical requirements.
Keywords: Serum glucose, Comparison and correlation, Glucose oxidase -peroxidase, Hexokinase, Method evaluation, Quality control.
References
- Kavitha A, Suresh P. Janakiraman Evaluation of Glucose Oxidase and Hexokinase Methods.Int J Biotechnol Biochem. 2018;14(1):51–58.
- National diabetes data group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance.Diabetes. 1979;28:1039–1057.
- Lawrence KA, Amadeo, Pesce J. Clinical chemistry: Theory, Analysis, correlation ; 2010,. p. 480–505.
- Kaplan AJLA, Pesce ; 2010,.
- Bishop ML, Fordy PE, Schoeff EL. Bishop Basic principles and practice of clinical chemistry 7th edition, principles, techniques, correlations ;. .
- Blick KE, C ABC, Liles SM, C MTASCPS. Principles of clinical chemistry, correlation and regression analysis- glucose methodology ;. .
- Passey RB, Gillum LR, Fuller JB. Evaluation and comparison of 10 glucose methods and the reference method recommended in the proposed product class standard.Clin Chem. 1977;23(1):131–139.
- Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Burns DE. Tietz fundamentals of clinical chemistry. PhD, Edward R Ashwood, David E Burns, MD: Carl A. Burtis ;. .
- Blick KE, Liles SM. Principles of Clinical chemistry ;. .
- Westgard JO, Vos DJD, Hunt MR. Concepts and practices in the evaluation of clinical chemistry methods. 11. Experimental procedures.Am J Med Technol. 1978;44:420–430.
- National committee for clinical laboratory standards (NCCLS). Approved guideline for method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples. Villanova, PA: NCCLS ; 2002,. National committee for clinical laboratory standards(NCCLS). Document no. EP09-A2.
- Shahzad K, Kim DH, Kang MJ. Analytic evaluation beta-human chorionic gonadotropin assay on the Abbott IMx and Elecsys2010 for its use in doping control.Clin Biochem. 2007;40:1259–1265.
- Westgard JO, Hunt MR. Use and interpretation of common statistical tests in method comparison studies.Clin Chom. 1973;19:49–57.
- Cembrowsky GS, Sullivan AM, Hofer TL. Quality control and statistic in clinical chemistry :principles, procedures, correlations 4th edition (MLBishop, J.K.Duben; Engel kirk, E.P.Fody,Eds ). Lippincott Williams and wilkins. In: Lippincott Williams and wilkins ; 2000,. p. 43–66. 4th edition.
- WBSP, editor. mathematics for the clinical laboratory 1st ; 1997,.
- Koch DD. Evaluation of methods with an introduction to statistical techniques, Tietz fundamentals of clinical chemistry 5th ed ; 2001,. p. 234–250.
- Meena S, John S, Robert, Geraldine M, Broderick C. Kinetic measurement of glucose with a centrifugal analyzer; hexokinasa and glucose oxidase procedures compared.Clin Chem. 1976;22(7):1100–
- Evaluation of an automated glucose-oxidase procedure.Clin Chem. 1975;21(10):93–99.
- Cornbleet PJ, Gochman N. Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis.Clin Chem. 1979;25:432–
- Neeley WE. -.Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):511–511. Author biography K Maria KumarAssociate Professor K VijayakumariProfessor and HOD K Sri Lakshmi2nd Year Post Graduate
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Kumar KM, Vijayakumari K, Lakshmi KS. A prospective comparative study of glucose estimation by hexokinase and glucose oxidase-peroxidase methods [Internet]. Int J Clin Biochem Res. 2019 [cited 2025 Oct 08];6(3):356-362. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcbr.2019.078
APA
Kumar, K. M., Vijayakumari, K., Lakshmi, K. S. (2019). A prospective comparative study of glucose estimation by hexokinase and glucose oxidase-peroxidase methods. Int J Clin Biochem Res, 6(3), 356-362. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcbr.2019.078
MLA
Kumar, K Maria, Vijayakumari, K, Lakshmi, K Sri. "A prospective comparative study of glucose estimation by hexokinase and glucose oxidase-peroxidase methods." Int J Clin Biochem Res, vol. 6, no. 3, 2019, pp. 356-362. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcbr.2019.078
Chicago
Kumar, K. M., Vijayakumari, K., Lakshmi, K. S.. "A prospective comparative study of glucose estimation by hexokinase and glucose oxidase-peroxidase methods." Int J Clin Biochem Res 6, no. 3 (2019): 356-362. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcbr.2019.078